-
Random Endorsement
-
Socialize With Me!
Recent Comments
- Welcome, Robot Overlords! (1)
Cristal Pump: "Competition is stiff and the variety of robots of all shapes and sizes is baffling, from 340lb combat robots to bartending artbots. Cristal Pump…"
- Belated Birth Announcement (3)
neill: "congrats!…"
- Investigating NFP: The Great Embryo Killer? (Part I) (15)
Funky Dung: ""The discussion is below anyone's expectation of reasonable articulation." But a critical comment offering no substance whatsoever meets those…"
HEWHitney: "The discussion is below anyone's expectation of reasonable articulation. Bovens is a respected medical ethicist. The criticisms are (at least not so…"
- Why Is Prostitution Illegal? (107)
Funky Dung: "isabel, No, this post has never been published by a reputable or peer-reviewed entity. However, self-published articles on the web (any web page,…"
-
Stats
-
Meta
- © 2008 Eric Williams
- Powered by WordPress
- Compliant XHTML & CSS
- Log in
Ales Rarus
A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog
random thought of the moment:
There’s no point in questioning authority if you aren’t going to listen to the answers.
— , Slashdot
rights
REAL ID = Real Mistake
Stop REAL ID! Submit comments to the Dept. of Homeland Security by May 8th!
A broad coalition of organizations across the United States is urging the public to submit comments rejecting the illegal national identification system created under the Department of Homeland Security's REAL ID program.
Five states and several members of Congress have rejected the scheme, […]
Reflection on Gonzales v. Carhart (the recent Ruling on the Partial Birth Abortion Ban)
Judicial Life Potentially Enters the Womb
550 U.S. ___ (2007)
On April 18, 2007, the Supreme Court of the United States decided, 5 to 4, in Gonzales v. Carhart (Carhart) that the Partial-Birth Abortion Act of 2003 (Act) was constitutional in view of Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (PP), and Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. […]
As(s)ine Legislation
Spanking is not ipso facto physical abuse. Furthermore, abusus non tollit usus - the abuse of a thing does not destroy it's right use.
CALIFORNIA TO CONSIDER OUTLAWING SPANKING
The story notes “it would be a misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail or a fine up to $1,000, although a legal expert advising […]
Sovereign Nations?
I was recently at a family function of my in-laws on my wife’s father’s side. We were discussing the concept of right and wrong in government as it related to sovereign nations. In other words, if a people, say those of France, say capital punishment is wrong, shouldn’t it be wrong everywhere? Should they fight […]
The Right to be Wrong
My recent post questioning unwavering support for the State of Israel generated a lot of discussion, much of which was off topic, involving religious tolerance, confessional governments, and whether or not anyone has a natural right to be wrong. Being off topic doesn't make the discussion irrelevant or uninteresting, though. So, in order to "purify" […]


