http://alesrarus.funkydung.com A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:11:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2829/comment-page-1#comment-170902 brett Fri, 12 Feb 2010 17:58:43 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/?p=2829#comment-170902 kvs, there is vast amount of classic art that would be almost as difficult to appreciate as it's modern equivalent. The classic western art aesthetic is very different from say a traditional African, Indian or Japanese aesthetic. What looks, feels or tastes or sounds good to an individual is very dependent on the cultural experience of that individual. Those with open minds are generally better equipped to experience and appreciate something with a different aesthetic sensibility than the one thery are accustomed to. To point out the Corinthian Column as the peak of western art and then discount all of modern art is pretty foolish. Admittedly, I don't think Tuyman's art featured here is that great, but there are equally mediocre or even yawn inducing pieces of classical western art out there. You can critique artist's work on an individual basis, but to critique modern art in general simply shows ignorance to what art is. Btw... What are your feelings on Doric, Ionic and Egyptian columns? there is vast amount of classic art that would be almost as difficult to appreciate as it’s modern equivalent. The classic western art aesthetic is very different from say a traditional African, Indian or Japanese aesthetic. What looks, feels or tastes or sounds good to an individual is very dependent on the cultural experience of that individual. Those with open minds are generally better equipped to experience and appreciate something with a different aesthetic sensibility than the one thery are accustomed to. To point out the Corinthian Column as the peak of western art and then discount all of modern art is pretty foolish. Admittedly, I don’t think Tuyman’s art featured here is that great, but there are equally mediocre or even yawn inducing pieces of classical western art out there.
You can critique artist’s work on an individual basis, but to critique modern art in general simply shows ignorance to what art is. Btw… What are your feelings on Doric, Ionic and Egyptian columns?]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1959/comment-page-1#comment-170675 saed Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:46:40 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archive/1959#comment-170675 ghg http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2829/comment-page-1#comment-170572 Faux Artist Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:29:59 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/?p=2829#comment-170572 I'm undertaking a very unique modern art social experiment to find out if todays art really is crap! Follow my progress at FauxArtist.co.uk Follow my progress at FauxArtist.co.uk]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1315/comment-page-1#comment-170304 Kaca Tue, 26 Jan 2010 11:11:55 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1315#comment-170304 Please, support me in prayers: For URGENT DIVINE INTERVENTION FOR COMPLETE RECONCILIATION with my loved one SHULE That SHULE DOES NOT GET INVOLVED INTO ANY NEW RELATIONSHIP, but that HE MAKES STEPS TOWARD ME (CALL, APPROACH), THAT GOD FORM LINES OF GOOD COMMUNICATION BETWEEN US, KEEP US IN HIS CARE and HELP US TO WORK OUT ALL PROBLEM THAT WE START AGAIN, OFFICIALLY GET MARRIED AND HAVE MANY CHILDREN! God gives promises, and I know He is FAITHFUL! Thank you very much. God bless you. I pray for you. Praise the Lord for He hear prayers and answer on it. Kaca For URGENT DIVINE INTERVENTION FOR COMPLETE RECONCILIATION with my loved one SHULE
That SHULE DOES NOT GET INVOLVED INTO ANY NEW RELATIONSHIP, but that HE MAKES STEPS TOWARD ME (CALL, APPROACH), THAT GOD FORM LINES OF GOOD COMMUNICATION BETWEEN US, KEEP US IN HIS CARE and HELP US TO WORK OUT ALL PROBLEM
THAT WE START AGAIN, OFFICIALLY GET MARRIED AND HAVE MANY CHILDREN!
God gives promises, and I know He is FAITHFUL!
Thank you very much. God bless you. I pray for you. Praise the Lord for He hear prayers and answer on it.
Kaca]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1856/comment-page-1#comment-170250 cherryl Sun, 24 Jan 2010 13:15:57 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1858#comment-170250 my question is what church if any follows the apoysials doctrien? I have read to be baptised in the name of jesus. but the ones that do so, seem to follow a lot of formoliziam. Or they put a heavy yoke on their flock. A dress code should I say. I think when Jesus comes back it will be for the sheep that hear his voice. now I'm not a church goer but I have read the bible and believe it. you'll have to forgive my spelling I have only had one cup of coffee this morning. and I'm not quite awake :) seem to follow a lot of formoliziam. Or they put
a heavy yoke on their flock. A dress code should I say. I think when Jesus comes back
it will be for the sheep that hear his voice.
now I’m not a church goer but I have read the bible and believe it. you’ll have to forgive my spelling I have only had one cup of coffee this morning. and I’m not quite awake ]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2167/comment-page-3#comment-170239 Eric Williams Sun, 24 Jan 2010 00:16:50 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2167#comment-170239 Thanks, Tiana. I'm glad most helped. :) I've moved on to new blogs (<a href="http://funkydung.com/politics" rel="nofollow">politics</a> and <a href="http://funkydung.com/family" rel="nofollow">family</a>), but I leave this one up for popular posts like this. I might eventually import it into my new blog, though. Anyhow, since writing this post I've learned that my argument is a common libertarian one. An excellent example can be found in Walter Block's classic, <a href="http://mises.org/books/defending.pdf" rel="nofollow">Defending the Undefendable</a>. I hope that helps. :)

I’ve moved on to new blogs (politics and family), but I leave this one up for popular posts like this. I might eventually import it into my new blog, though.

Anyhow, since writing this post I’ve learned that my argument is a common libertarian one. An excellent example can be found in Walter Block’s classic, Defending the Undefendable. I hope that helps. ]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1959/comment-page-1#comment-170026 Zane Fri, 15 Jan 2010 07:28:16 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archive/1959#comment-170026 I searched for 'light' I saw that the image was put through some kind of effect.
I saw that the image was put through some kind of effect.]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2452/comment-page-1#comment-169934 Kabubu Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:19:09 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2452#comment-169934 Day one of my last period was 12/26. I was raped on 1/1 and took plan B on 1/4. Today, 1/11, day 17 of my cycle, I had my period. My cycle is usually about 29 days long, give or take a 2-3 days. I felt none of the warning signs that generally accompany my period. In reading this, I am inclined to think that plan B may be the cause for this unusually short cycle. I will continue to monitor myself for any abnormalities and relate this to my doctor if the need to do so arises. http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2425/comment-page-1#comment-169217 Euthanize Liberalism Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:25:28 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2425#comment-169217 If Plan A, selfishly separating the reproductive function from the pleasure of the sexual act, through (willfully) ignorant use of a potential abortifacient fails prevent conception from continuing and if Plan B, outright willful abortifacient fails what is plan C?
and if Plan B, outright willful abortifacient fails

what is plan C?]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2425/comment-page-1#comment-169216 Euthanize Liberalism Wed, 16 Dec 2009 14:20:37 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2425#comment-169216 Are you sure ignoring reality is the best defense? "there's no evidence that it's abortifacient" Except for the evidence that ALL post 1967 chemical "birth" control agents rely on the 'tertiary' abortifacient effect in the Physicians Desk Reference and Medline? Therefore ALL current chemical female "birth" control agents of the day are POTENTIALLY ABORTIFACIENT. Any potential for willful abortifacient is morally reprehensible and unacceptable.
“there’s no evidence that it’s abortifacient”

Except for the evidence that ALL post 1967 chemical “birth” control agents rely on the ‘tertiary’ abortifacient effect in the Physicians Desk Reference and Medline?

Therefore ALL current chemical female “birth” control agents of the day are POTENTIALLY ABORTIFACIENT.

Any potential for willful abortifacient is morally reprehensible and unacceptable.]]>