Music Review: “Urban Cave” by Brother (2003)

[largecd-urbancave.jpg]Brother is one of my favorite bands. The following is a slightly modified version of review of their 2003 release "Urban Cave". I’ll be posting a review of their latest album "Pax Romana MMV" soon. The grading scheme is as follows.

  1. Really Bad
  2. Bad
  3. OK
  4. Good
  5. Excellent

My initial reaction to this album was "Who the hell made this crap and where’s Brother?!?" After listening to it a few times, I got used to most of it, and quite liked some bits. My overall impression are that it’s too short, too electronic, too dark, and too slow. Here’s a track-by-track breakdown:

1. Funny

The instrumental intro is really cool, but the rhymed lyrics after it strike me as amateurish. After the first verse, the song is an interesting listen and kind of catchy. I’m not sure I like the rapped bridge, though. Some days it’s OK. Other days it really annoys me. Score: 3/5

2. Fragile

I haven’t reversed the back-tracked vocal opening yet, so I don’t know what’s said. I didn’t get to hear this song many times in concert, but I’m almost positive that is was "lighter". The musical feel was darker than the lyrics seemed to warrant. It’s not a bad song, but it just seems "off" somehow. Score: 3/5

3. Death of Me

I enjoyed this track and thought it would be a good radio single (and a hell of a lot better than a lot of the crap hogging the airwaves these days). All around, this was a good track. Score: 3.5/5

4. Wear Me Down

The I really enjoyed this track except for two things. I cannot fathom the significance of "This is not an exercise" and the klaxon at the end is grating and irritating. Score: 4/5

5. River

I love this song! It’s catchy, upbeat, and well-balanced (between effects and instruments). Did anyone else think the song had a U2 feel? There are two big problems, though. "Ah there is is" doesn’t really sit well with me; why in the world is the song so short?!? Score: 4.5/5

6. Fly Away

["Fly Away" made its debut on "Your Backyard" in 1999.]

Why did they feel the need to remake this song? It wasn’t a real winner to start with. Now the lyrics have been simplified and the beat sounds like bad disco. The chorus is pretty catchy, but it’s just too simple. I just keep wondering where I’m supposed to be flying and why. Furthermore, the effects and samples were irritating. The scratch that sounds almost like a camera shutter was like fingernails on a chalkboard to me. Score: 2.5/5

7. Inside of Me

["Inside of Me" is a remake of "Bitch", which originally appeared on "i you you me" in 2001.]

Ahhhhhh!!!! They’ve killed it! They’ve killed "Bitch"!  This song is absolutely awful. The effects drove me nuts (Noticing a trend, folks?). The song has lost all "rock". I miss the ass-kickin’ guitar riffs. I miss the "urgent" feel of the original. Lastly, what the !@#$ is up with the zoo sounds near the end of the song?!? Score: 1.5/5

8. Mad But Happy

This track had real potential to be groovin’, but it just stops dead after half a minute. What’s the point in teasing us? Then again, 30 seconds of this is better than 3 minutes of "Inside of Me". Score: 2.5/5 (points lost for length)

9. Lonely With You

["Lonely With You" is a retooling of "Lonely", which originally appeared on "Your Backyard" in 1999.]

Another remake – why?  This one isn’t too bad. It’s a tolerable listen and the end kinda rocks. Again, the music doesn’t seem to match the lyrics. The original seemed desperate without being psycho. I really identified with it since at the time I was in love with a girl who didn’t love me. Most of this version has a hippy acid-trip vibe to it. Score: 3.5/5

10. In Your Name

Compared to other "angry" Brother songs, it’s not their best. I prefer "Chains" (from the 1995 album "Exit From Screechville"). On its own, though, it’s a very good track. I really liked the cello. Score: 4/5

11. Crazy

["Crazy" is a remake of a song of the same title from 2001’s "i you you me".]

This wasn’t as butchered as "Bitch", but it’s still not as good as the original. It’s not as bouncy or fun as before. I also really miss "And I don’t want that hangin’ over me" and "And when you come to think again, you’ll wonder what it all meant. And when you think again, perhaps you’ll find you’re just as bent." Ultimately, what this version lacks is the "anthem" quality that the original had. Score: 3.5/5

12. Goodbye

This solid tune’s only real flaws are the weak and seemingly out of tune vocals at the beginning and the abrupt ending. Score: 3.5/5

13. How Do You Feel?

Anybody else think the opening sounds like music from a horror video game? At this point in the album I’m about to go postal. We’ve been waiting this freakin’ long (since ) for new Brother material and we get a bunch of pathetic remakes!?! I never loved the original, but it was certainly fun to sing along with at concerts. Score: 3/5

14. Just Listen

Again I feel cheated. This song is beautiful. Why are we teased with 1:30??? Score: 3.5/5 (Imagine the score if it was full length.)

In conclusion, I’d like to mostly praise the new tunes and lament the remakes. I find myself wondering why the album is an anemic 43 minutes. I know there’s more material to release. I really wanted "Hang On" and "Give It Away". In the end, though, Brother music is like pizza – even when it’s bad it’s good.

Album score: 45.5/70 (65% D)

Comments 8

  1. Mark La Roi wrote:

    Just out of curiosity, was the sudden switch to lots of crude language a purposeful action?

    Posted 02 Mar 2006 at 12:20 pm
  2. Funky Dung wrote:

    Actually, it’s an artifact of when I write the review originally. Expect a toned down version shortly. Thanks for pointing that out. :)

    Posted 02 Mar 2006 at 12:37 pm
  3. Funky Dung wrote:

    I made a couple tweaks, but I didn’t change much of what you might be calling crude. Perhaps my post on profanity might clear things up.

    Posted 02 Mar 2006 at 12:54 pm
  4. Mark La Roi wrote:

    Just curious! It really stood out from your normal posts so I was wondering if there was a subtle message. Too many conspiracy stories churning my brain! 😉

    Posted 02 Mar 2006 at 3:31 pm
  5. howard wrote:

    Interesting review. Sounds like I might want to check out some of their older stuff.

    And in an aside, what exactly is “interpretive charity”?

    Posted 04 Mar 2006 at 12:23 pm
  6. Funky Dung wrote:

    If you’d read the posts you were supposed to read, you’d know. 😉 It’s a phrase I borrowed from another blogger. Had I coined it, I might have called it “charitable interpretation”. The idea is that you give you fellow commenters/bloggers the benefit of the doubt that they didn’t intend to come off and blithering idiot or a complete ass.

    Posted 04 Mar 2006 at 1:53 pm
  7. howard wrote:

    I can’t be bothered to read all that! Besides the fact that I’ve probably read them and forgotten several times over by now, so… wait, did you just call me a blithering idiot?
    😉

    Posted 05 Mar 2006 at 5:37 pm
  8. Steve Nicoloso wrote:

    The charitable interpretation would be complete ass… :-)

    Posted 05 Mar 2006 at 9:09 pm

Trackbacks & Pingbacks 2

  1. From Ales Rarus - A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog » Music Review: “Pax Romana MMV” by Brother (2005) on 14 Mar 2006 at 10:04 am

    […] Music Review: “Pax Romana MMV” by Brother (2005) By Funky Dung As promised, here’s my review of Brother’s Pax Romana MMV. The grading scheme is as follows. […]

  2. From Ales Rarus - A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog » Music Review: “As You Were” by Brother (2006) on 09 May 2006 at 1:06 pm

    […] Music Review: “As You Were” by Brother (2006) By Funky Dung "As You Were" is a compilation of fan-selected favorites from Brother’s 13-year pre-Pax Romana repitoire, from Black White to Urban Cave. The tracks chosen, though limited to only one disc, match up well to my personal favorites mix, Point of View. […]

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *