About Funky Dung
Who is Funky Dung?
29-year-old grad student in Intelligent Systems (A.I.) at the University of Pittsburgh. I consider myself to be politically moderate and independent and somewhere between a traditional and neo-traditional Catholic.
I was raised Lutheran, spent a number of years as an agnostic, and joined the Catholic Church at the 2000 Easter Vigil.
Why Funky Dung?
I haven't been asked this question nearly as many times as you or I might expect. Funky Dung is a reference to an obscure Pink Floyd song. On the album Atom Heart Mother, there is a track called Atom Heart Mother Suite. It's broken up into movements, like a symphony, and one of the movements is called Funky Dung. I picked that nickname a long time ago (while I was still in high school I think), shortly after getting an internet connection for the first time. To me it means "cool/neat/groovy/spiffy stuff/crap/shiznit", as in "That's some cool stuff, dude!"
Whence Ales Rarus?
I used to enjoy making people guess what this means, but I've decided to relent and make it known to all. Ales Rarus is a Latin play on words. "Avis rarus" means "a rare bird" and carries similar meaning to "an odd fellow". "Ales" is another Latin word for bird that carries connotations of omens, signs of the times, and/or augery. If you want to get technical, both "avis" and "ales" are feminine (requiring "rara", but they can be made masculine in poetry (which tends to breaks lots of rules). I decided I'd rather have a masculine name in Latin. ;) Yeah, I'm a nerd. So what? :-P
Wherefore blog?
It is my intention to "teach in order to lead others to faith" by being always "on the lookout for occasions of announcing Christ by word, either to unbelievers . . . or to the faithful" through the "use of the communications media". I also act knowing that I "have the right and even at times a duty to manifest to the sacred pastors [my] opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church, and [I] have a right to make [my] opinion known to the other Christian faithful, with due regard to the integrity of faith and morals and reverence toward [my and their] pastors, and with consideration for the common good and the dignity of persons." (adapted from CCC 904-907)
Statement of Faith
I have been baptized and confirmed in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. I, therefore, renounce Satan; I renounce all his works; I renounce all his allurements.
I hold and profess all that is contained in the Apostles' Creed, the Niceno- Constantinopolitan Creed, and the Athanasian Creed.
Having been buried with Christ unto death and raised up with him unto a new life, I promise to live no longer for myself or for that world which is the enemy of God but for him who died for me and rose again, serving God, my heavenly Father, faithfully and unto death in the holy Catholic Church.
I am obedient to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. That is, I promote and defend authentic Catholic Teaching and Faith in union with Christ and His Church and in union with the Holy Father, the Bishop of Rome, the Successor of St. Peter.
Thanks be unto Thee, O my God, for all Thy infinite goodness, and, especially, for the love Thou hast shown unto me at my Confirmation. I Give Thee thanks that Thou didst then send down Thy Holy Spirit unto my soul with all His gifts and graces.
May He take full possession of me for ever.
May His divine unction cause my face to shine.
May His heavenly wisdom reign in my heart.
May His understanding enlighten my darkness.
May His counsel guide me.
May His knowledge instruct me.
May His piety make me fervent.
May His divine fear keep me from all evil.
Drive from my soul, O Lord, all that may defile it.
Give me grace to be Thy faithful soldier, that having fought the good fight of faith, I may be brought to the crown of everlasting life, through the merits of Thy dearly beloved Son, our Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen.
Behind the Curtain: an Interview With Funky Dung (Thursday, March 03, 2005)
I try to avoid most memes that make their way 'round the blogosphere (We really do need a better name, don't
we?), but some are worth participating in. Take for instance the "interview game" that's the talk o'
the 'sphere. I think it's a great way to get to know the people in neighborhood. Who are the people in your
neighborhood? In your neighborhod? In your neigh-bor-hoo-ood...*smack* Sorry, Sesame Street flashback.
Anyhow, I saw Jeff "Curt Jester"
Miller's answers and figured since he's a regular reader of mine he'd be a good interviewer. Without
further ado, here are my answers to his questions.
1. Being that your pseudonym Funky Dung was chosen from a Pink Floyd track on Atom Heart Mother, what is you
favorite Pink Floyd song and why?
Wow. That's a tuffy. It's hard to pick out a single favorite. Pink Floyd isn't really a band known for
singles. They mostly did album rock and my appreciation of them is mostly of a gestalt nature. If I had to
pick one, though, it'd be "Comfortably Numb". I get chills up my spine every time I hear it and if
it's been long enough since the last time, I get midty-eyed. I really don't know why. That's a rather
unsatisfying answer for an interview, so here are the lyrics to a Rush song. It's not their best piece of music,
but the lyrics describe me pretty well.
New World Man
He's a rebel and a runner
He's a signal turning green
He's a restless young romantic
Wants to run the big machine
He's got a problem with his poisons
But you know he'll find a cure
He's cleaning up his systems
To keep his nature pure
Learning to match the beat of the old world man
Learning to catch the heat of the third world man
He's got to make his own mistakes
And learn to mend the mess he makes
He's old enough to know what's right
But young enough not to choose it
He's noble enough to win the world
But weak enough to lose it ---
He's a new world man...
He's a radio receiver
Tuned to factories and farms
He's a writer and arranger
And a young boy bearing arms
He's got a problem with his power
With weapons on patrol
He's got to walk a fine line
And keep his self-control
Trying to save the day for the old world man
Trying to pave the way for the third world man
He's not concerned with yesterday
He knows constant change is here today
He's noble enough to know what's right
But weak enough not to choose it
He's wise enough to win the world
But fool enough to lose it ---
He's a new world man...
2. What do you consider your most important turning point from agnosticism to the Catholic Church.
At some point in '99, I started attending RCIA at the Pittsburgh Oratory. I mostly went to ask a lot of
obnoxious Protestant questions. Or at least that's what I told myself. I think deep down I wanted desperately
to have faith again. At that point I think I'd decided that if any variety of Christianity had the Truth, the
Catholic Church did. Protestantism's wholesale rejection of 1500 years of tradition didn't sit well with me,
even as a former Lutheran.
During class one week, Sister Bernadette Young (who runs the program) passed out thin booklet called "
Handbook for Today's Catholic". One paragraph
in that book spoke to me and I nearly cried as I read it.
"A person who is seeking deeper insight into reality may sometimes have doubts, even about God himself.
Such doubts do not necessarily indicate lack of faith. They may be just the opposite - a sign of growing faith.
Faith is alive and dynamic. It seeks, through grace, to penetrate into the very mystery of God. If a
particular doctrine of faith no longer 'makes sense' to a person, the person should go right on seeking. To
know what a doctrine says is one thing. To gain insight into its meaning through the gift of understanding is
something else. When in doubt, 'Seek and you will find.' The person who seeks y reading, discussing,
thinking, or praying eventually sees the light. The person who talks to God even when God is 'not there' is
alive with faith."
At the end of class I told Sr. Bernadette that I wanted to enter the Church at the next Easter vigil.
3. If you were a tree what kind of, oh sorry about that .. what is the PODest thing you have ever
done?
I set up
WikiIndex, a clearinghouse for reviews
of theological books, good, bad, and ugly. It has a long way to go, but it'll be cool when it's finished. :)
4. What is your favorite quote from Venerable John Henry Newman?
"Ten thousand difficulties do not make one doubt."
5. If you could ban one hymn from existence, what would it be?
That's a tough one. As a member of
the Society for a Moratorium on the Music of
Marty Haugen and David Haas, there are obviously a lot of songs that grate on my nerves. If I had to pick
one, though, I'd probably pick
"Sing
of the Lord's Goodness" by Ernie Sands.
Ahh, I see. I thought you meant that communion alone had been denied.
First off, Eric, if she were in a state of mortal sin and received communion, she’d only be worse off. (At least from the most mechanical point of view — though I find it hard to believe that God would point and laugh at the poor vegetative woman who was force-fed the Eucharist in a state of mortal sin.)
Secondly, the viaticum (in the Latin Church, at least) is three things: Absolution, Extreme Unction, and communion. Absolving her is all that is necessary.
How do you respond to a post like this on how this has become politicized?
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2005_03_20_digbysblog_archive.html#111134934659869241
dlw
I both read and heard that she did receive last rites and communion the day her tube was removed. I think that worked out.
The awfulness is that she should be being fed by mouth now. The tube should be considered the extraordinary means, if they insist on identifying it as such. If she can live on eating by mouth….
But her husband has forbidden that for 8 years.
This is brutal starvation.
I do agree that I think the Republican party is a disgrace, as is the Tort Reform Act. Having doctors create a board to certify cases is one thing. Having caps when the treatment for a person who wants treatment for the rest of their life, especially in Ms. Schiavo’s case (I feel gross calling her “Mrs.” when I feel her husband wasn’t ever a true husband).
I also think that starving a person to death is disgusting, but an unfortunate part of American law. Because we don’t like taking responsibility, we have no duty to aid those who need it. If you see a kid drowning and you’re a champion swimmer? Don’t worry! You don’t have to do a thing, legally! In fact, if you did try and save him, you could get in more trouble.
On the other hand, I’ve heard that Schiavo’s soul is a topic for discussion. I can’t see how she could commit a mortal sin, being that she can’t make a decision mentally nor physically do much but blink. That’s just cruel to say, from what I understand of her capabilities at this point, even if you go to the extremes of what she can do. Even if people take away her feeding tubes, she can’t stop them. It’s not suicide if she can do nothing either way, correct?
I understand your concern. I worried about the same thing (re: the end of the sentence). However, if you click the link and read the transcript, you’ll see that Schiavo trailed off. The periods do not indicate editing on my part, but a representation of a statement interrupted by King.
I’m aware of all that, Tom. She’s not permitted to receive last rites because the Schindlers aren’t permitted to bring in a priest, so far as I know. I guess we’ll find out soon enough.
M. SCHIAVO: Yes, I do. But this is not about them, it’s about Terri. And I’ve also said that in court. We didn’t know what Terri wanted, but this is what we want…
KING: You’re not — it didn’t cost you anything. This is not something where you’re looking to save money?
M. SCHIAVO: No. There’s no money involved. We need to move on from that question. That question has been asked me 50 million times. There is no money!
Michael Schiavo was granted authority under Florida law to make decisions for his wife’s medical treatment. Her parents then challenged his decision, and the issue wound up in the Florida court. In that sense, everything is about what Michael Schiavo and his wife’s parents want, because Terri is functionally not around to say what she wants. So no, he does not know what she wants. He does think he knows what she would have wanted over fifteen years ago before she entered this “persistent vegetative state,” but still, technically, no, he doesn’t know what Terri wanted for all the hullaballoo that’s going on right now.
She may have committed mortal sins that she didn’t get a chance to confess before she became incapacitated. That’s about the only way I see her soul in any danger.
Tom, the courts have denied her right to receive viaticum. That would count as feeding her.
way to take half a sentence and hang your position on it.
it’s entirely possible that you have a valid point here, but you need to give the context and you need to at least give the end of the sentence. From what you’ve given it is entirely possible he simply mispoke, and corrected himself later in the sentence.
Not that I’m saying he did, just that you really haven’t given a substanitive chunk of data here.
Well, if she belongs to an apostolic church (I dunno what her religious persuasion is), last rites will take care of mortal sins from the pre-“vegetative” state, provided she’s contrite.