"Regardless of the emotion and political activism that led to Bush pushing 'Terri's Law,' there is a system of checks and balances in place to ensure that no one person makes a decision that could be a matter of life and death."
Isn't that the power Michael Schiavo wants? Anybody want to respond to this Pitt News op ed?
Funky Dung
















Comments 3
The system of checks and balances ensuring that "no one person makes a decision that could be a matter of life and death" applies only to the government, and not to private citizens. The op-ed specifically states that the case is about the power of Governor Bush, not the rights of Michael or Terri Schiavo.
+0
Posted 01 Sep 2004 at 4:40 pm ¶My concern is that if the government is kept out of the Schiavo case, Michael would get his way. I don't think Terry's "husband isn't wrong" or that he "is convinced his wife would not want to be kept on a feeding tube".
+0
Posted 01 Sep 2004 at 5:36 pm ¶If that was me on the feeding tube I'd want my wife to pull it out and get on with her life.
+0
Posted 02 Sep 2004 at 5:55 am ¶Post a Comment