Wow. That vice presidential debate was a lot different from the presidential debate
and from last election’s vice debate. The moderator was inept – sloppy and unable
to maintain order. Cheney and Edwards were out for blood. Neither candidate really
said anything particularly substantive. Cheney remained calmer and more professional
than Bush, so Republicans will be happy about that. That’s not enough to make up
for last Thursday, though. Edwards brought up all the hot-button issues and I’m
certain viewers will say he won, despite having no real plans to speak of.
Category Archives: government, law, and politics
Talking Heads
After having a nice chat with some friends, walking home in the brisk fall breezes, and catching up on my email, I can now sit down to record my thoughts on the presidential debate. I thought about having a transcript in front of me as I write, but decided against it. I want to record my perceptions, bias and all. I think my mistakes or wrong impressions might be at least as interesting as what I get right.
Before proceeding to my impressions, I want to make it abundantly clear that I’m not a fan of Bush or Kerry. I don’t intend to vote for either. I did not go into the viewing experience rooting for one over the other. To me, it was like watching a football game between teams that mean little or nothing to me. I just want to see good football. In this case, I just wanted to see a good debate.
Now, without further ado…
Currency Up in Smoke
Open Debates
From Slashdot:
slithytove writes “As many of us are aware,
the presidential debates are currently controlled by an organization called the
Commision on Presidential Debates. As anyone who’s seen a presidential debate recently
could guess, the CPD
does just what our two major parties want:
exclude third parties
and impose rules that
make the event more of a joint press conference than a debate. Non-establishment
candidates Michael
Badnarik and David Cobb will be having
an actual debate this Thursday. After debating each other, they will be rebutting
the points Bush and Kerry make in their pseudo-debate. Free
Market News will be streaming it and providing a download afterwards.”
Does anyone else really freakin’ hate the italics in Slashdot posts? They make reading
more difficult and less pleasant.
Party Crashers
I definitely want to watch this
PBS special.
CRASHING THE PARTIES 2004, a one-hour special airing on PBS Wednesday, September 29, 2004, takes the Robert Frost approach – the political road less traveled. Viewers will meet all the third party candidates who are on enough state ballots to have a mathematical chance of winning the presidency. Spanning the ideological spectrum, these underdogs share one thing in common – a passionate desire to make America a better place.
[…]
Advocates of a two-party system argue that multiple parties weaken the electoral process by fragmenting the country into special interest groups, instead of building a broad-based coalition-achieving consensus. Third party supporters maintain that they make the elections more inclusive and representative of the public. In their view, Americans have dozens of choices of toothpaste brands – why not more than two choices for the most powerful job on earth?