The Perils of 24-hour News

"The scare tactics, poor reporting and lack of reputable sources came to a sad and tragic climax this week as we news junkies watched. The horror of a West Virginia mining disaster was brought into homes coast to coast and there was no shortage of misinformation. Thirteen miners had been trapped by an explosion and cave in deep within a coal mine near Buchannon. As the first dead body was recovered, Fox News Channel reported that no one knew the cause of death, as yet, but assured we viewers that they would have that information, first. Hosts Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes then badgered a Red Cross volunteer live, worldwide, demanding the woman give them an opinion about whether it would be 'better' if the dead man was found to have 'suffocated from carbon monoxide inhalation? or had been ?crushed to death by the cave in'. Luckily, the volunteer kept her head, and rather than give an uninformed guess (the basis for most television news), she informed Hannity three times that she could not possibly give him an answer. She'd never been to a mining accident site, she explained, and the Red Cross' job was to comfort the families of the victims, not to perform autopsies."

"It was hard for Sean to mask his disappointment."

"Meanwhile, over on CNN, Anderson Cooper was getting to the core of the story by interviewing an anonymous teenaged girl who had talked to somebody who had stood next to a meeting between the trapped men's families and the coal company. The meeting, held in a nearby church, was off-limits to the press (smart move, families). That didn't stop CNN. They found this little girl who had talked to somebody who overheard what was going on in that meeting. And with this one twice-removed completely unreliable source, they hit the air live, worldwide, to inform the awaiting viewing public about the latest developments. "

Read more of what Scott Paulsen has to say.

Funky Dung

Print | Email

Popularity: 1% [?]

Social bookmarking:
  • del.icio.us
  • Fark
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Digg
  • Netscape
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • SphereIt
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Google
  • TwitThis
  • Pownce

Tags: , , , , ,

Possibly Related Posts:

Comments 2

  1. Bene Diction wrote:

    When I see coverage of a mine disaster in WV I have to think X 10. (population Canada/US) I have to think a different set of rules for 24/7 news channels. I have to think advertising dollars and ratings.

    Thing is, 87% of people use TV as a primary news source. TV news doesn't have to stop presses, issue corrections, all TV has to do is update.

    I wonder what stopping the presses cost newspapers? What does uncritical consumption cost us?

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0

    Posted 06 Jan 2006 at 1:44 am
  2. writergirl wrote:

    Stopping the presses does cost a newspaper quite a bit of money. My newspaper stopped presses early Wednesday morning, after 1/3 of the papers had already been printed with the incorrect story about the miners' survival. An editor managed to cobble together a new story with the correct — and more tragic — information. This story ran in 2/3 of our press run; it would have cost far too much to discard the thousands of copies of papers with incorrect information (and besides that, we needed to get the paper on newsstands ASAP).

    Unfortunately, the misinformation was not corrected in time for most newspapers in the Eastern Time Zone (or even many in the Central Time Zone) to print the true, and tragic, story. The following day, almost all the newspapers that carried the incorrect story printed editors' notes along with a follow-up story on the front page, explaining why and how they got it wrong.

    Newspapers have their flaws, but I prefer them to cable news. At least newspapers acknowledge their errors and print corrections.

     Add karma Subtract karma  +0

    Posted 06 Jan 2006 at 12:58 pm

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *


Note: This post is over 2 years old. You may want to check later in this blog to see if there is new information relevant to your comment.

By submitting a comment here you grant this site a perpetual license to reproduce your words and name/web site in attribution.