About Funky Dung
Who is Funky Dung?
29-year-old grad student in Intelligent Systems (A.I.) at the University of Pittsburgh. I consider myself to be politically moderate and independent and somewhere between a traditional and neo-traditional Catholic.
I was raised Lutheran, spent a number of years as an agnostic, and joined the Catholic Church at the 2000 Easter Vigil.
Why Funky Dung?
I haven't been asked this question nearly as many times as you or I might expect. Funky Dung is a reference to an obscure Pink Floyd song. On the album Atom Heart Mother, there is a track called Atom Heart Mother Suite. It's broken up into movements, like a symphony, and one of the movements is called Funky Dung. I picked that nickname a long time ago (while I was still in high school I think), shortly after getting an internet connection for the first time. To me it means "cool/neat/groovy/spiffy stuff/crap/shiznit", as in "That's some cool stuff, dude!"
Whence Ales Rarus?
I used to enjoy making people guess what this means, but I've decided to relent and make it known to all. Ales Rarus is a Latin play on words. "Avis rarus" means "a rare bird" and carries similar meaning to "an odd fellow". "Ales" is another Latin word for bird that carries connotations of omens, signs of the times, and/or augery. If you want to get technical, both "avis" and "ales" are feminine (requiring "rara", but they can be made masculine in poetry (which tends to breaks lots of rules). I decided I'd rather have a masculine name in Latin. ;) Yeah, I'm a nerd. So what? :-P
It is my intention to "teach in order to lead others to faith" by being always "on the lookout for occasions of announcing Christ by word, either to unbelievers . . . or to the faithful" through the "use of the communications media". I also act knowing that I "have the right and even at times a duty to manifest to the sacred pastors [my] opinion on matters which pertain to the good of the Church, and [I] have a right to make [my] opinion known to the other Christian faithful, with due regard to the integrity of faith and morals and reverence toward [my and their] pastors, and with consideration for the common good and the dignity of persons." (adapted from CCC 904-907)
Statement of Faith
I have been baptized and confirmed in the name of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. I, therefore, renounce Satan; I renounce all his works; I renounce all his allurements.
I hold and profess all that is contained in the Apostles' Creed, the Niceno- Constantinopolitan Creed, and the Athanasian Creed.
Having been buried with Christ unto death and raised up with him unto a new life, I promise to live no longer for myself or for that world which is the enemy of God but for him who died for me and rose again, serving God, my heavenly Father, faithfully and unto death in the holy Catholic Church.
I am obedient to the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. That is, I promote and defend authentic Catholic Teaching and Faith in union with Christ and His Church and in union with the Holy Father, the Bishop of Rome, the Successor of St. Peter.
Thanks be unto Thee, O my God, for all Thy infinite goodness, and, especially, for the love Thou hast shown unto me at my Confirmation. I Give Thee thanks that Thou didst then send down Thy Holy Spirit unto my soul with all His gifts and graces.
May He take full possession of me for ever.
May His divine unction cause my face to shine.
May His heavenly wisdom reign in my heart.
May His understanding enlighten my darkness.
May His counsel guide me.
May His knowledge instruct me.
May His piety make me fervent.
May His divine fear keep me from all evil.
Drive from my soul, O Lord, all that may defile it.
Give me grace to be Thy faithful soldier, that having fought the good fight of faith, I may be brought to the crown of everlasting life, through the merits of Thy dearly beloved Son, our Savior, Jesus Christ. Amen.
Behind the Curtain: an Interview With Funky Dung (Thursday, March 03, 2005)
I try to avoid most memes that make their way 'round the blogosphere (We really do need a better name, don't
we?), but some are worth participating in. Take for instance the "interview game" that's the talk o'
the 'sphere. I think it's a great way to get to know the people in neighborhood. Who are the people in your
neighborhood? In your neighborhod? In your neigh-bor-hoo-ood...*smack* Sorry, Sesame Street flashback.
Anyhow, I saw Jeff "Curt Jester"
Miller's answers and figured since he's a regular reader of mine he'd be a good interviewer. Without
further ado, here are my answers to his questions.
1. Being that your pseudonym Funky Dung was chosen from a Pink Floyd track on Atom Heart Mother, what is you
favorite Pink Floyd song and why?
Wow. That's a tuffy. It's hard to pick out a single favorite. Pink Floyd isn't really a band known for
singles. They mostly did album rock and my appreciation of them is mostly of a gestalt nature. If I had to
pick one, though, it'd be "Comfortably Numb". I get chills up my spine every time I hear it and if
it's been long enough since the last time, I get midty-eyed. I really don't know why. That's a rather
unsatisfying answer for an interview, so here are the lyrics to a Rush song. It's not their best piece of music,
but the lyrics describe me pretty well.
New World Man
He's a rebel and a runner
He's a signal turning green
He's a restless young romantic
Wants to run the big machine
He's got a problem with his poisons
But you know he'll find a cure
He's cleaning up his systems
To keep his nature pure
Learning to match the beat of the old world man
Learning to catch the heat of the third world man
He's got to make his own mistakes
And learn to mend the mess he makes
He's old enough to know what's right
But young enough not to choose it
He's noble enough to win the world
But weak enough to lose it ---
He's a new world man...
He's a radio receiver
Tuned to factories and farms
He's a writer and arranger
And a young boy bearing arms
He's got a problem with his power
With weapons on patrol
He's got to walk a fine line
And keep his self-control
Trying to save the day for the old world man
Trying to pave the way for the third world man
He's not concerned with yesterday
He knows constant change is here today
He's noble enough to know what's right
But weak enough not to choose it
He's wise enough to win the world
But fool enough to lose it ---
He's a new world man...
2. What do you consider your most important turning point from agnosticism to the Catholic Church.
At some point in '99, I started attending RCIA at the Pittsburgh Oratory. I mostly went to ask a lot of
obnoxious Protestant questions. Or at least that's what I told myself. I think deep down I wanted desperately
to have faith again. At that point I think I'd decided that if any variety of Christianity had the Truth, the
Catholic Church did. Protestantism's wholesale rejection of 1500 years of tradition didn't sit well with me,
even as a former Lutheran.
During class one week, Sister Bernadette Young (who runs the program) passed out thin booklet called "Handbook for Today's Catholic
". One paragraph
in that book spoke to me and I nearly cried as I read it.
"A person who is seeking deeper insight into reality may sometimes have doubts, even about God himself.
Such doubts do not necessarily indicate lack of faith. They may be just the opposite - a sign of growing faith.
Faith is alive and dynamic. It seeks, through grace, to penetrate into the very mystery of God. If a
particular doctrine of faith no longer 'makes sense' to a person, the person should go right on seeking. To
know what a doctrine says is one thing. To gain insight into its meaning through the gift of understanding is
something else. When in doubt, 'Seek and you will find.' The person who seeks y reading, discussing,
thinking, or praying eventually sees the light. The person who talks to God even when God is 'not there' is
alive with faith."
At the end of class I told Sr. Bernadette that I wanted to enter the Church at the next Easter vigil.
3. If you were a tree what kind of, oh sorry about that .. what is the PODest thing you have ever
I set up WikiIndex
, a clearinghouse for reviews
of theological books, good, bad, and ugly. It has a long way to go, but it'll be cool when it's finished. :)
4. What is your favorite quote from Venerable John Henry Newman?
"Ten thousand difficulties do not make one doubt."
5. If you could ban one hymn from existence, what would it be?
That's a tough one. As a member of the Society for a Moratorium on the Music of
Marty Haugen and David Haas
, there are obviously a lot of songs that grate on my nerves. If I had to pick
one, though, I'd probably pick "Sing
of the Lord's Goodness" by Ernie Sands
Indeed, parents can and should teach their children to be quiet in church, but it’s very difficult to teach an infant that. Sometimes, infants just get fussy. Is that disruptive? Sure, it can be. But what is the alternative — that people shouldn’t have children at all, or if they have them, they shouldn’t bring the children to church?
The parents of one of my friends didn’t bring her to church until she was nearly 5 years old, because they didn’t want to take the chance that she would be disruptive, even though she was a generally well-behaved child. I think their actions send a quite unpleasant message — that church is for everyone but children.
That’s the message that many Protestant denominations send, incidentally, with their (nearly mandatory) nurseries during church services. I used to be a nursery worker back in my Protestant days, and I remember how the ushers at the church services would “suggest” or strongly “encourage” parents to drop their children off at the nursery instead of bringing them into the service. I have always appreciated that the Catholic Church welcomes God’s children of all ages.
When I see a child misbehaving at Mass, I always thank God that the parents did not abort this child and that the parents have brought him/her to Mass, ask God to bless that child with a little glimpse of the glory of the Mass, and ask God to bless that child with an enduring faith. For me, that’s been far more effective than dwelling on the child’s misbehavior.
One final thought: Some parents haven’t had good examples of parenting skills and may not know how to properly discipline or teach their children. Many of the young parents today probably come from some rather dysfunctional modern American families — divorce, remarriage, stepparenting, single parenting, etc. Instead of complaining that they aren’t teaching their children, perhaps we should be looking for ways that we as a church can support them… My old Protestant church had a very active “Mothers of Preschoolers” group, but I’ve never seen anything like that at a Catholic parish. I submit that it might be a good idea.
I do concur that children can and should be taught good church manners. Does that mean that they will always practice them? Absolutely not. Much is dependent not just upon parenting or disciplinary techniques, but upon individual temperaments. Children are, after all, human persons, complete with souls, made in the image and likeness of God. Not dogs, nor even cats. As such, they can be quite unpredictable!
As a personal example, my oldest child, soon to be six, is a shining example of Catholicism. He’s caring, compassionate, and tries harder than many adults to follow the Mass. At about age 2, however, my husband and I wondered if we would ever celebrate another Mass together without one of us escorting Captain Tantrum to his carseat to be strapped in until he could calm down. It took a lot of work and commitment and stress and tension to teach our super-smart, super-active toddler to behave during Mass. Even now, he has his moments – but usually when he is sick or over-tired.
Then came our happy-go-lucky second child. At two and a half, we’ve never had to take him out of church. Well, OK, there was that one time that I had the kids at a night Mass alone because Dad had to work late and he started running laps around our pew while I was nursing his newborn sister, who wasn’t at all happy to be there and was letting me and everyone else know it…Oh, and did I mention I was singing with a very *small* choir (i.e. one person per voice part) that night?
The point is, you’ll never know from three pews back what the real story is. Perhaps the parents really are inconsiderate. Perhaps they really don’t know any better. Or perhaps they are really doing their best and already feel like utter failures and that everyone is staring at them (like me!). And perhaps God is using them as the instrument to increase everyone else’s holiness – you know, virtues like patience and understanding…and patience…
Incidentally, I’ve been to Masses where the parents shushing their kids are more distracting than the kids!
“Much is dependent not just upon parenting or disciplinary techniques, but upon individual temperaments.”
Indeed. Parents may have the best parenting skills in the world, but the child is simply full of energy and struggles to sit quietly for an hour, or the child is easily brought to tears/tantrums, etc….
My point above about parenting skills wasn’t meant to imply that parents whose children sometimes misbehave during Mass don’t have proper parenting skills (I am certain that most do and the kid is just having a bad day). I only meant that, if Funky or anyone else thinks the parents really are doing a bad job of being parents, instead of insulting their parenting, perhaps we as a Church should look for ways to support them and help them in their vocations as parents.
I think that would be far more effective — and it also would help create more of a culture of life in our parishes. We believe in the sanctity of human life, so let’s rejoice when the little ones are at Mass and try to figure out ways to help them (and their parents) experience God.
With this single example you have demonstrated that which I have found woefully lacking at too many masses – parental effort. Far too seldom are troublesome kids taken out of mass. I applaud you for doing so when the need arises.
Thanks, Funky. It was a lot easier, logistically speaking, when we had just one child to take him out than it is now with three. Also, for the fidgety youngster, being taken out of a quiet, dark place with lots of grownups and hard seats can be a sort of reward that a parent might want to avoid. I’m just not one to criticize other parents.
Laudemus, I agree with you wholeheartedly about offering support for parents and welcoming children to our liturgy. Part of being a pro-life church is loving and supporting all those little babies God gave to mothers who lovingly accepted them. I’ve gotten my share of both praise for my beautiful family and nasty looks for their imperfections. What has meant absolutely the most, however, has been when those around us have gently, quietly, and unassumingly looked for practical ways to *share* the burden of proper education, discipline, and/or distraction (whatever seems to be most appropriate). I’ve had grandmothers let the kids touch their shiny rings or page through their mysterious missal full of old holy cards. I’ve had dads catch their bored little eyes with winks and nods noticed only by us, only to help turn their gaze to the action up front, where it belongs. Kind strangers have picked up dropped gloves, books, etc. and returned them to the boys with a smile. These are all little ways that others in our parish have helped us, as you said, to experience God. Things like these make us feel welcomed and loved, not merely tolerated. Now that we have a bit more experience, we enjoy passing on those favors – we carry plenty of St. Joseph’s books and Bible board books to share, and do our best to help other parents out without taking over.
As one of our good friends, who is a convert and a parent, says: “I just joined a church that is against birth control and wants me to have babies. I shouldn’t be forced to leave as soon as he makes a noise!”
One last thing that I’ve noticed: most ushers see a family with little ones and immediately seat them in the back for ease of removal. The ushers at our parish began to notice that we avoided their help and took the kids straight up front – as close to the front as we could get. Now they seat us there. Are we completely rude and inconsiderate? I prefer to think we are giving our kids the best opportunity to behave. They end up sitting where they can see (and we can point out to them) exactly what the priest and altar servers are doing, what the tabernacle looks like, our beautiful Infant of Prague, the statues of Mary and Joseph…what they DON’T see as much of is pews and backs of heads (which can get pretty boring!).
I have to agree to great extent with the previous comments. However…
It took two years for my child to behave properly at mass. During this time, I went to this place where there were lots of people and something going on at the front that required I work to keep my child quiet. At this place I was entirely focused on my child. Oh and I think there was some religious thing going on called a “mass”, but I can’t be sure since I wasn’t paying any attention.
Perhaps some parents choose to get something out of the Mass rather than focusing all their attention on their child? Perhaps they’re the ones doing exactly what they should be doing at mass. Maybe they have their priorities right, and mine are wrong.
I see what you’ve done as a cross you’ve borne, for which you and your child will be richly rewarded. It is one which I will someday (God willing) gladly bear. You have sacrificed attentive participation in the mass for the proper upbringing of your child and out of courtesy to your fellow parishioners. However, you still received the Eucharist, and that’s what matters most. Rest assured that the Lord didn’t stiff you on any graces because you missed some prayers or the homily while guiding your child in proper behavior. 😉
Actually, that brings up an important point. Any parent who deliberately chooses attentive participation in the mass over proper rearing of their children strikes me as rather selfish and as having disordered priorities.
I’m not so sure I was sacrificing all that much. Though I probably would have prefered to be doing something else, I think I was engaged in what I would call my favorite activity in the world: interacting with my child.
Would your opinion change with what I said above if I also told you I usually didn’t receive the Eucharist (being the sinner that I am)?
I think intention matters. Interacting with your child because you’d rather do that than be attentive to mass is not good. However, if the child genuinely needs to be attended to, regardless of why you choose to attend, it is good to attend to the child. If your primary intention is to attend to your child’s need (including discipline), rather than distract yourself from mass, you’ve done doubly well; attending the child’s needs is good and so is ordering your priorities properly.
No. In fact, I’d considered adding “either actually or spiritually” to “recieved the Eucharist”, but decided at the last moment to delete it. You should consider getting a prayer card to help with performing an act of spiritual communion, if you have not already done so or memorized such a prayer.
Pingback: Catholic Carnival 112