Part of what got Bush elected was his pro-life stance. Now he has to deliver something to those who elected him and, more broadly, all those who hope to end abortion and prevent ESCR and cloning. Will he? Can he?
Pro-life leader questions Bush’s commitment to ending abortions
Pro-life group urges Bush to take immediate action against abortion
Senator Tells President Bush Not to Appoint Pro-Life Judges to Supreme Court
Key Senator Denies Warning Bush on Abortion Issue
“After Abortion” has a quote posted that aims to answer the question,
“[W]hat
might’ve happened to all the young voters?”
[In response to Bishop Wuerl's weak stance against pro-choice "Catholic" politicians, Shaun Pierce wrote the following letter. He has yet to receive a reply. – Funky]
Here's a relatively neutral summary of the stem cell debate that even the liberal gadflies in Evangelical Outpost's comment boxes approve of.
The New York Times, known for it's painfully obvious liberal bias, has surprised me by publishing an even-handed, if a bit skimpy, appraisal of Bush and Kerry campaign statements regarding stem cell research.
I definitely sympathize with Democrats for Life.
"A Zogby poll showed 40 percent of self-declared Democrats say they oppose abortion."
How many Demcratic politicians are pro-life? I doubt it’s 40%. I’d be surprised if it’s as high as 4%.