Tag Archives: politics

Open Debates

From Slashdot:

slithytove writes “As many of us are aware,
the presidential debates are currently controlled by an organization called the
Commision on Presidential Debates. As anyone who’s seen a presidential debate recently
could guess, the CPD
does just what our two major parties want:
exclude third parties
and impose rules that
make the event more of a joint press conference than a debate. Non-establishment
candidates Michael
Badnarik
and David Cobb will be having
an actual debate this Thursday
. After debating each other, they will be rebutting
the points Bush and Kerry make in their pseudo-debate. Free
Market News
will be streaming it and providing a download afterwards.”

Does anyone else really freakin’ hate the italics in Slashdot posts? They make reading
more difficult and less pleasant.

Party Crashers

I definitely want to watch this
PBS special
.

CRASHING THE PARTIES 2004, a one-hour special airing on PBS Wednesday, September 29, 2004, takes the Robert Frost approach – the political road less traveled. Viewers will meet all the third party candidates who are on enough state ballots to have a mathematical chance of winning the presidency. Spanning the ideological spectrum, these underdogs share one thing in common – a passionate desire to make America a better place.

[…]

Advocates of a two-party system argue that multiple parties weaken the electoral process by fragmenting the country into special interest groups, instead of building a broad-based coalition-achieving consensus. Third party supporters maintain that they make the elections more inclusive and representative of the public. In their view, Americans have dozens of choices of toothpaste brands – why not more than two choices for the most powerful job on earth?

Empty Promises

All political candidates lie. They all spin and distort and twist
half-truths to look good to voters and diminish their opponent.
Each has VALID
proposals, none of which will either save the country or ruin it. Do you really
think that either candidate is going to get their health plan passed without so
much amendment as to make it unrecognizable? It won’t happen, so stop worrying about
it.

Preach on, sister!

Right! This Calls for Immediate Discussion!

Another Triumph for the U.N.

The resolution passed, and it was a good day for alliance-nurturing and burden-sharing
– for the burden of doing nothing was shared equally by all. And we are by now used
to the pattern. Every time there is an ongoing atrocity, we watch the world community
go through the same series of stages: (1) shock and concern (2) gathering resolve
(3) fruitless negotiation (4) pathetic inaction (5) shame and humiliation (6) steadfast
vows to never let this happen again.

The "never again" always comes. But still, we have all agreed, this sad
cycle is better than having some impromptu coalition of nations actually go in "unilaterally"
and do something. That would lack legitimacy! Strain alliances! Menace international
law! Threaten the multilateral ideal!

It’s a pity about the poor dead people in Darfur. Their numbers are still rising,
at 6,000 to 10,000 a month.

A bit of Monty Python’s The Life of Brian sprang immediately
into my mind when I read this
NYT op-ed. (Thanks, Nomad
Tavern
)

Continue reading

Keeping Them Honest

RatherGate has highlighted the need for watchdogs to keep Big Media honest. Often times, politicians have used Big Media to propagate lies, half-truths, and misinformation. The Annenberg Fact Check is (or at least seems to be) a nonpartisan organization dedicated to holding politicians accountable. They are an interesting contrast to Misleader, which only holds the Bush administration accountable. (Thanks, Andrea)