Pride of Place

Thisentryis part 4 of 4 in the He Who Sings Prays Twice

Readers of Stuff's post on singing before/during/after communion may find these interesting.

The Mass of Vatican II

[…]In any case, the first use of , i.e., active participation, referred explicitly and exclusively to the restoration of the congregational singing of Gregorian . In 1928, Pope Pius XI reiterated the point in his Apostolic Letter, Divini Cultus. Nineteen years after that, in the Magna Carta of liturgical reform, Mediator Dei, issued by Pius XII, the same term was used with the same meaning. So until the Second Vatican Council, the term "active participation" referred exclusively to the singing of Gregorian by the people.

Sacramentum Caritatis: Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation on the Eucharist as the Source and Summit of the Church's Life and Mission

42. In the ars celebrandi, liturgical song has a pre-eminent place. (126) Saint Augustine rightly says in a famous sermon that "the new man sings a new song. Singing is an expression of joy and, if we consider the matter, an expression of love" (127). The People of God assembled for the sings the praises of God. In the course of her two-thousand-year history, the Church has created, and still creates, and songs which represent a rich patrimony of faith and love. This heritage must not be lost. Certainly as far as the is concerned, we cannot say that one song is as good as another. Generic improvisation or the introduction of musical genres which fail to respect the meaning of the should be avoided. As an element of the , song should be well integrated into the overall celebration (128). Consequently everything – texts, , execution – ought to correspond to the meaning of the mystery being celebrated, the structure of the rite and the liturgical seasons (129). Finally, while respecting various styles and different and highly praiseworthy traditions, I desire, in accordance with the request advanced by the Synod Fathers, that Gregorian be suitably esteemed and employed (130) as the proper to the Roman (131).

[…]

62. None of the above observations should cast doubt upon the importance of such large-scale liturgies. I am thinking here particularly of celebrations at international gatherings, which nowadays are held with greater frequency. The most should be made of these occasions. In order to express more clearly the unity and universality of the Church, I wish to endorse the proposal made by the Synod of Bishops, in harmony with the directives of the Second Vatican Council, (182) that, with the exception of the readings, the homily and the prayer of the faithful, it is fitting that such liturgies be celebrated in . Similarly, the better-known prayers (183) of the Church's should be recited in and, if possible, selections of Gregorian should be sung. Speaking more generally, I ask that future priests, from their time in the seminary, receive the preparation needed to understand and to celebrate Mass in , and also to use texts and execute Gregorian ; nor should we forget that the faithful can be taught to recite the more common prayers in , and also to sing parts of the to Gregorian . (184)

Song of Songs

Thisentryis part 2 of 4 in the He Who Sings Prays Twice

Of all the heavy debates on that seem to cause a threatening snarl and an intimidating stripe of raised hair down the backs of even the most gentle child of God, that on appropriate is the only one which actually causes yours truly to bite. I am no theologian, nor expert on Church documents. I am, however, a musician and a . As such, I care enough about this debate to investigate suggestions I find contrary to what I have been taught or have come to believe on my own.

This article from an Australian Catholic newspaper made a few such suggestions that rubbed me the wrong way. Fortunately, the author's arguments are made based on segments of the General Instruction of the Roman Missal (), which is easily accessible from the USCCB website. Upon reading the document, I found (as I hope you, the astute reader will, too) much of the article's conclusions to be taken out of context.

Continue Reading »

Still Amusing the Church to Death

Thisentryis part 2 of 4 in the He Who Sings Prays Twice
Remember the post I wrote about Chuck Colsen's critique of trite worship music? I agreed with Colsen's distaste for "Draw Me Close to You" and its ilk. My buddy Rob didn't. When discussion on both blogs died, I figured the matter was closed for the time being. I didn't think the article had legs beyond my little corner of the net, but it seems I was wrong. Sam Storms of Enjoying God Ministries and Justin Tayler of Between Two Worlds threw their two cents in with Rob. I wouldn't have know that, though, if Godblogger heavyweight Tim Challies hadn't joined the fray. I'm happy to say he's on my side. ;) Challies presents a seven-part test for "whether a particular song is suitable for worshiping our God, especially in a corporate setting", borrowed from a book by Elmer Towns and Ed Stetzer. He also adds an eighth criterion of his own. Continue Reading »

Amusing the Church to Death

Thisentryis part 1 of 4 in the He Who Sings Prays Twice

"When church directors lead the congregation in singing some praise , I often listen stoically with teeth clenched. But one Sunday morning, I cracked. We had been led through endless repetitions of a meaningless ditty called, 'Draw Me Close to You.' The song has zero theological content and could be sung in a nightclub, for that matter. When I thought it was finally and mercifully over, the leader beamed at us and said in a cheerful voice, 'Let’s sing that again, shall we?' 'No!' I shouted loudly. Heads all around me spun while my wife cringed."

"I admit I prefer more traditional hymns. But even given that, I am convinced that much of the being written for the Church today reflects an unfortunate trend—slipping across the line from worship to entertainment. [We] are in danger of amusing ourselves to death, to borrow the title of the classic Neil Postman book."

That quote might have been written by any number of disgruntled (neo-, ultra-, or otherwise) traditionalist Catholics I know, but it wasn't. , a prominent wrote it. Read the rest and leave a comment here so we can discuss this problem Evangelicals and Catholics must face together.

On a side note, Amused to Death is also the title of a very good Roger Waters solo album.