<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dr. Paul May Do Harm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2901/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2901</link>
	<description>A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BrooklynHaze</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2901/comment-page-1#comment-109506</link>
		<dc:creator>BrooklynHaze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/?p=2901#comment-109506</guid>
		<description>Definitely a good act, Ron Paul is wrong on this one.  Also, he was the ONLY person to vote against it, the rest of the 3% abstained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Definitely a good act, Ron Paul is wrong on this one.  Also, he was the ONLY person to vote against it, the rest of the 3% abstained.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2901/comment-page-1#comment-72592</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 16:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/?p=2901#comment-72592</guid>
		<description>I did not say GINA would be another affirmative action law, per se. I said, "I haven't formed an educated opinion of my own. From my gut, though, I'd say I'm wary of any government attempt to manage discrimination. Affirmative Action is a nightmare."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I did not say GINA would be another affirmative action law, per se. I said, &#8220;I haven&#8217;t formed an educated opinion of my own. From my gut, though, I&#8217;d say I&#8217;m wary of any government attempt to manage discrimination. Affirmative Action is a nightmare.&#8221;]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Discrimination Always Wrong? @ Ales Rarus</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2901/comment-page-1#comment-72586</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Discrimination Always Wrong? @ Ales Rarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/?p=2901#comment-72586</guid>
		<description>[...] response to Gutter Ball Master&#39;s post, &#34;Dr. Paul May Do Harm&#34;, I offer the following article as rebuttal. I do not claim to be in total agreement with it, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[[...] response to Gutter Ball Master&#39;s post, &#34;Dr. Paul May Do Harm&#34;, I offer the following article as rebuttal. I do not claim to be in total agreement with it, [...]]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2901/comment-page-1#comment-72581</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 15:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/?p=2901#comment-72581</guid>
		<description>If we don't want people to be discriminated against on the basis of genetic makeup, then let's amend the Constitution and enshrine genetic privacy as a basic human right. Let's not be writing laws willy-nilly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[If we don&#8217;t want people to be discriminated against on the basis of genetic makeup, then let&#8217;s amend the Constitution and enshrine genetic privacy as a basic human right. Let&#8217;s not be writing laws willy-nilly.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Graham</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2901/comment-page-1#comment-72507</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 04:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/?p=2901#comment-72507</guid>
		<description>I think it was because of his interpretation of strict adherence to the Constitution. It does represent an expansion of federal government powers. Sometimes, we like it (and I do like the intent of the act) and sometimes we don't but Congressman Paul says no to any expansion not authorized in the Constitution. I think this could reasonably fall under the Commerce Clause, because insurance is usually bought interstate, but the commerce clause has been abused to no end.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[I think it was because of his interpretation of strict adherence to the Constitution. It does represent an expansion of federal government powers. Sometimes, we like it (and I do like the intent of the act) and sometimes we don&#8217;t but Congressman Paul says no to any expansion not authorized in the Constitution. I think this could reasonably fall under the Commerce Clause, because insurance is usually bought interstate, but the commerce clause has been abused to no end.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
