http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629 A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:52:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629#comment-45933 Book Reviews and More: Catholic Carnival 128 Wed, 18 Jul 2007 02:29:56 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629#comment-45933 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] with Eric as he shares a number of posts about the Summorum Pontificum.With him we hop once, twice and three times.Slowing down to look at the roses. Kevin at HMS Blog talks to us about "God's Law [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] with Eric as he shares a number of posts about the Summorum Pontificum.With him we hop once, twice and three times.Slowing down to look at the roses. Kevin at HMS Blog talks to us about "God's Law [...]]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629#comment-45769 Did Bishop Trautman Even Read the What the Pope Wrote?! @ Ales Rarus Fri, 13 Jul 2007 02:28:10 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629#comment-45769 [...] you thought the diocese of Pittsburgh's memo about Summorum Pontificum was bad, you ain't seen nuthin' yet. Check out this nonsense from Erie: The recent [...] http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629#comment-45764 Trackback - Powered by HaloScan.com Thu, 12 Jul 2007 23:38:19 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629#comment-45764 <!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] URL for this entry:http://haloscan.com/tb/stribe/4030568822197464361Memo to Pittsburgh Priests on Motu ProprioExcerpt: The ink on Summorum Pontificum was barely dry before officials for the diocese of [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--> [...] URL for this entry:http://haloscan.com/tb/stribe/4030568822197464361Memo to Pittsburgh Priests on Motu ProprioExcerpt: The ink on Summorum Pontificum was barely dry before officials for the diocese of [...]]]> http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629#comment-45730 Chad Kimmel Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:18:51 +0000 http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2629#comment-45730 Eric, Great post here. To sum all of this up, if any parish has a "stable" group of people who want to celebrate with the 1962 missal, the pastor should "willingly accept their requests". And if the pastor does not grant this desire, then they should go to the bishop, and the bishop should "earnestly request their desire." Well, there you go. You can already see the loop-hole that pastors will use to get out of this. How do you quantify "stable"? Also, many pastors will say that they are not able to "willingly accept their requests" since they do not even know how to perform mass in the 1962 missal form. Their solution: go to St. Boniface. And there ya go Eric, we are back to square one.
Great post here. To sum all of this up, if any parish has a "stable" group of people who want to celebrate with the 1962 missal, the pastor should "willingly accept their requests". And if the pastor does not grant this desire, then they should go to the bishop, and the bishop should "earnestly request their desire."

Well, there you go. You can already see the loop-hole that pastors will use to get out of this. How do you quantify "stable"? Also, many pastors will say that they are not able to "willingly accept their requests" since they do not even know how to perform mass in the 1962 missal form. Their solution: go to St. Boniface. And there ya go Eric, we are back to square one.]]>