<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#034;Father&#034; Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293</link>
	<description>A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Smith</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293/comment-page-1#comment-9616</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293#comment-9616</guid>
		<description>As regards the Eucharist -- his liturgical playing wouldn't change a thing, as long as he says the consecration and has intent (intent, not necessarily, to specifically cause a transmutation of the elements and offer a sacrifice, but to do as the Church does).  So the default answer is that a priest's Mass is valid as long as he doesn't actively change his intent.  Also, open communion doesn't have anything to do with sacramental validity -- it's not as though the Eucharist reverts to bread and wine when it touches the lips of an unbeliever.  The classic demonstration of this concept is an imaginary situation in which a priest, while distributing communion, drops a Host on the floor, and a dog runs over and eats it.  Did the dog receive the Eucharist?  Yes -- the transformation being already accomplished, there is nothing to stop the dog from receiving the Body of Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[As regards the Eucharist &#8212; his liturgical playing wouldn&#039;t change a thing, as long as he says the consecration and has intent (intent, not necessarily, to specifically cause a transmutation of the elements and offer a sacrifice, but to do as the Church does).  So the default answer is that a priest&#039;s Mass is valid as long as he doesn&#039;t actively change his intent.  Also, open communion doesn&#039;t have anything to do with sacramental validity &#8212; it&#039;s not as though the Eucharist reverts to bread and wine when it touches the lips of an unbeliever.  The classic demonstration of this concept is an imaginary situation in which a priest, while distributing communion, drops a Host on the floor, and a dog runs over and eats it.  Did the dog receive the Eucharist?  Yes &#8212; the transformation being already accomplished, there is nothing to stop the dog from receiving the Body of Christ.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edey</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293/comment-page-1#comment-9612</link>
		<dc:creator>edey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Apr 2006 06:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293#comment-9612</guid>
		<description>but why is it ok to get married by a heretic in one sense (protestant) but not another (excommunicated priest)? why can you get a dispensation in one case but not the other?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[but why is it ok to get married by a heretic in one sense (protestant) but not another (excommunicated priest)? why can you get a dispensation in one case but not the other?]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293/comment-page-1#comment-9611</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293#comment-9611</guid>
		<description>You cannot licitly marry outside of the Church without dispensation.  I don't think the Church is likely to grant dispensation to be married by an excommunicated priest.  Without the dispensation, the marriage is illicit and the sacrament invalid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[You cannot licitly marry outside of the Church without dispensation.  I don&#039;t think the Church is likely to grant dispensation to be married by an excommunicated priest.  Without the dispensation, the marriage is illicit and the sacrament invalid.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edey</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293/comment-page-1#comment-9610</link>
		<dc:creator>edey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293#comment-9610</guid>
		<description>how does him being in heresy affect marriages? the operators of the marriage are the couple themselves (i think). the couple gives the Sacrament to each other, so even if you have a bogus priest, would that affect Sacramentality?? granted, you might need a dispensation...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[how does him being in heresy affect marriages? the operators of the marriage are the couple themselves (i think). the couple gives the Sacrament to each other, so even if you have a bogus priest, would that affect Sacramentality?? granted, you might need a dispensation&#8230;]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293/comment-page-1#comment-9609</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 18:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293#comment-9609</guid>
		<description>1) I strongly suspect that he's monkeyed with the liturgy in such a way that he no longer confects the Eicharist.

2) Doesn't the fact that he offers the Eucharist to anyone who comes affect things in any way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[1) I strongly suspect that he&#039;s monkeyed with the liturgy in such a way that he no longer confects the Eicharist.<br />
<br />
2) Doesn&#039;t the fact that he offers the Eucharist to anyone who comes affect things in any way?]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Smith</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293/comment-page-1#comment-9607</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Apr 2006 15:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2293#comment-9607</guid>
		<description>Actually, most of his sacraments are valid.  Most likely, his absolutions are invalid and his marriages null, but, other than that, his sacraments are genuine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Actually, most of his sacraments are valid.  Most likely, his absolutions are invalid and his marriages null, but, other than that, his sacraments are genuine.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
