<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I&#039;ve Been Saying All Along</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2136/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2136</link>
	<description>A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Advogado de Diabos</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/2136#comment-4198</link>
		<dc:creator>Advogado de Diabos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archive/2140#comment-4198</guid>
		<description>Not too suprising. Its why debate os often devolves into shouting matches. My one point of contention with the study may be that if the participants are vary familiar with the issues, they may have already reasoned out why they can ignore certain facts. Their reasoning may be good or bad but they may have already done it at some level. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Naw, on second thought I take it back and I agree with funky, they are all just stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Not too suprising. Its why debate os often devolves into shouting matches. My one point of contention with the study may be that if the participants are vary familiar with the issues, they may have already reasoned out why they can ignore certain facts. Their reasoning may be good or bad but they may have already done it at some level. <br /><br />Naw, on second thought I take it back and I agree with funky, they are all just stupid.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
