<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Last Resort?  I Don&#039;t Buy It, Mr. President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954</link>
	<description>A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 22:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954#comment-35900</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1954#comment-35900</guid>
		<description>While Iran isn't winning any popularity contests, it seems I was wrong about imminent war. Sometimes I'm very happy to be wrong. Then again, when I'm pleasantly surprised by events, my cynical mind tends to wonder if current situations are "too quiet".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[While Iran isn&#039;t winning any popularity contests, it seems I was wrong about imminent war. Sometimes I&#039;m very happy to be wrong. Then again, when I&#039;m pleasantly surprised by events, my cynical mind tends to wonder if current situations are &#034;too quiet&#034;.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4HisChurch</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954#comment-3147</link>
		<dc:creator>4HisChurch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1954#comment-3147</guid>
		<description>That is what I'm worried about--our troops are being spread so thinly.  Do we really want another theater of operations?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[That is what I&#039;m worried about&#8211;our troops are being spread so thinly.  Do we really want another theater of operations?]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micah holmquist</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954#comment-3148</link>
		<dc:creator>micah holmquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1954#comment-3148</guid>
		<description>FWIW, Bush has previously said all options are on the table RE Iran. I haven't gone through the whole google search (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=%22All+options+are+on+the+table%22+bush+iran+site%3Awhitehouse.gov&#038;btnG=Google+Search) but he did say it on Feb. 22, 2005 in Belgium to, according to the Whitehouse transcript, "laughter."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050222-8.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[FWIW, Bush has previously said all options are on the table RE Iran. I haven&#039;t gone through the whole google search (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&#038;q=%22All+options+are+on+the+table%22+bush+iran+site%3Awhitehouse.gov&#038;btnG=Google+Search) but he did say it on Feb. 22, 2005 in Belgium to, according to the Whitehouse transcript, &#034;laughter.&#034;<br /><br /><a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050222-8.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050222-8.html</a>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954#comment-3149</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1954#comment-3149</guid>
		<description>Unless a city goes up in flames from a terrorist nuke that can be proven to have come out of Iran, a land invasion ain't gonna happen. After the lack of WMDs in Iraq and the failure to stabilize the country post-invasion, the American people will be quite opposed to another war.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yes, Bush isn't up for reelection again, but the congress is in a little over a year and the GOP congresscritters know that the quickest way to get themselves back in the minority is to fund and support another invasion under the Bush doctrine (even if it were logistically feasible, which it isn't). And if you think they won't say no to the president, then where is the social security reform that the president said he'd spend his political capital on? Congresscritters are out for themselves first and formost.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The President knows this. His comments are sabre rattling, or at most a prelude to bombings. He's not going to invade, if for no other reason than he knows he can't accomplish it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Unless a city goes up in flames from a terrorist nuke that can be proven to have come out of Iran, a land invasion ain&#039;t gonna happen. After the lack of WMDs in Iraq and the failure to stabilize the country post-invasion, the American people will be quite opposed to another war.<br /><br />Yes, Bush isn&#039;t up for reelection again, but the congress is in a little over a year and the GOP congresscritters know that the quickest way to get themselves back in the minority is to fund and support another invasion under the Bush doctrine (even if it were logistically feasible, which it isn&#039;t). And if you think they won&#039;t say no to the president, then where is the social security reform that the president said he&#039;d spend his political capital on? Congresscritters are out for themselves first and formost.<br /><br />The President knows this. His comments are sabre rattling, or at most a prelude to bombings. He&#039;s not going to invade, if for no other reason than he knows he can&#039;t accomplish it.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954#comment-3150</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1954#comment-3150</guid>
		<description>If we'd been more successful on #1, didn't have our troops spread so thinly, weren't relying so heavily on the National Guard - who should be at home guarding the nation, and if I werren't so tired of Bush's cowboy diplomacy, I might take this matter in stride.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[If we&#039;d been more successful on #1, didn&#039;t have our troops spread so thinly, weren&#039;t relying so heavily on the National Guard - who should be at home guarding the nation, and if I werren&#039;t so tired of Bush&#039;s cowboy diplomacy, I might take this matter in stride.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Powerball</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954#comment-3151</link>
		<dc:creator>Powerball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1954#comment-3151</guid>
		<description>Funky:&lt;br /&gt;I suggest you go back and review the "Axis of Evil" speech. Bush made it clear back then he was going to deal (one way or another) with Iraq, Iran and North Korea.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We are now just moving on to number 2 on the list!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Funky:<br />I suggest you go back and review the &#034;Axis of Evil&#034; speech. Bush made it clear back then he was going to deal (one way or another) with Iraq, Iran and North Korea.<br /><br />We are now just moving on to number 2 on the list!]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edey</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1954#comment-3152</link>
		<dc:creator>edey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1954#comment-3152</guid>
		<description>maybe i'm just getting a bit cynical, but i really have come to expect this kind of behavior from the current administration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[maybe i&#039;m just getting a bit cynical, but i really have come to expect this kind of behavior from the current administration.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
