<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Election</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1477/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1477</link>
	<description>A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sheep and Goats @ Ales Rarus</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1477#comment-29559</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheep and Goats @ Ales Rarus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 14:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1487#comment-29559</guid>
		<description>[...] November 10th, 2004 by Funky Dung     Christian Conservative has an interesting post on predestination. Any of my Catholic readers want to refute his points? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[[...] November 10th, 2004 by Funky Dung     Christian Conservative has an interesting post on predestination. Any of my Catholic readers want to refute his points? [...]]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1477#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1487#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Funky,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I've been meaning to respond to this very interesting question for quite some time, but, alas, it is an extremely broad (read: "time-consuming") question.  And the little ol' election got in the way, too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My short answer is:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My "church" doesn't have views (i.e., catechism) on such questions.  That fact is, itself, a view I suppose... albeit a very weak one.  In fact, we (most evangelicals) don't have a catechism at all.  This may explain the intellectual weakness (and political gullibility) of "my people."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TTFN...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Funky,<br /><br />I&#039;ve been meaning to respond to this very interesting question for quite some time, but, alas, it is an extremely broad (read: &#034;time-consuming&#034;) question.  And the little ol&#039; election got in the way, too.<br /><br />My short answer is:<br /><br />My &#034;church&#034; doesn&#039;t have views (i.e., catechism) on such questions.  That fact is, itself, a view I suppose&#8230; albeit a very weak one.  In fact, we (most evangelicals) don&#039;t have a catechism at all.  This may explain the intellectual weakness (and political gullibility) of &#034;my people.&#034;<br /><br />TTFN&#8230;]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
