<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1422/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1422</link>
	<description>A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1422#comment-29683</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 19:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1422#comment-29683</guid>
		<description>Science's proper function is to ask and answer "what". Religion's proper function is to ask and answer "why".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Science&#039;s proper function is to ask and answer &#034;what&#034;. Religion&#039;s proper function is to ask and answer &#034;why&#034;.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theomorph</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1422#comment-724</link>
		<dc:creator>theomorph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1422#comment-724</guid>
		<description>Can't say I agree with Artigas or Gould when they claim that science doesn't overlap with religion.  Both ask the same questions:  Why are we here?  Why do we behave the way we do?  How can we attain greater control over ourselves and our environment?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The difference is in how they &lt;em&gt;answer&lt;/em&gt; the questions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;They don't really separate until they reach the realm of the truly unknowable, at which point science says, "It's unknowable," while religion says, "Ah, now is my chance to make up a good story!"  They're still trying to answer the same questions, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Can&#039;t say I agree with Artigas or Gould when they claim that science doesn&#039;t overlap with religion.  Both ask the same questions:  Why are we here?  Why do we behave the way we do?  How can we attain greater control over ourselves and our environment?<br /><br />The difference is in how they <em>answer</em> the questions.<br /><br />They don&#039;t really separate until they reach the realm of the truly unknowable, at which point science says, &#034;It&#039;s unknowable,&#034; while religion says, &#034;Ah, now is my chance to make up a good story!&#034;  They&#039;re still trying to answer the same questions, though.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
