<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tongue in Cheek?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1101/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1101</link>
	<description>A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ales Rarus - A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog &#187; Cheeky</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1101/comment-page-1#comment-9548</link>
		<dc:creator>Ales Rarus - A Rare Bird, A Strange Duck, One Funky Blog &#187; Cheeky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1101#comment-9548</guid>
		<description>[...] Regarding yesterday&#8217;s &#34;Tongue in Cheek?&#34;, a poster on the CathNews discussion board has pointed out that Ron Calli is a play on the name Angelo Roncalli, a.k.a. Pope John XXIII. Still, I wonder if the pseudonymous author was taking himself seriously or borrowing from the comic stylings of Jonathan Swift (ala &#34;A Modest Proposal&#34;). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[[...] Regarding yesterday&#039;s &quot;Tongue in Cheek?&quot;, a poster on the CathNews discussion board has pointed out that Ron Calli is a play on the name Angelo Roncalli, a.k.a. Pope John XXIII. Still, I wonder if the pseudonymous author was taking himself seriously or borrowing from the comic stylings of Jonathan Swift (ala &quot;A Modest Proposal&quot;). [...]]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1101/comment-page-1#comment-9202</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1101#comment-9202</guid>
		<description>Yes, I was aware of that. I apologize for not being clearer. At any rate, this prejudice is common in the English-speaking world. I read the Economist magazine online, and while British, its difficulties (as I see them--they apparently have no doubts or debate on how to portray the Church) with understanding Rome are quite similar to the NY Times.

The political and philosophical tradition of Britain was critical to making the USA the workable democracy it is now. I am an Anglophile in many regards, but the secularist mentality that plagues Americans has its roots in England, and therefore it is no surprise to see similar prejudices and blindspots in countries like Australia or Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[Yes, I was aware of that. I apologize for not being clearer. At any rate, this prejudice is common in the English-speaking world. I read the Economist magazine online, and while British, its difficulties (as I see them&#8211;they apparently have no doubts or debate on how to portray the Church) with understanding Rome are quite similar to the NY Times.<br />
<br />
The political and philosophical tradition of Britain was critical to making the USA the workable democracy it is now. I am an Anglophile in many regards, but the secularist mentality that plagues Americans has its roots in England, and therefore it is no surprise to see similar prejudices and blindspots in countries like Australia or Canada.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Funky Dung</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1101/comment-page-1#comment-9201</link>
		<dc:creator>Funky Dung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1101#comment-9201</guid>
		<description>"the American media"

Actually, this was an Australian publication.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[&#034;the American media&#034;<br />
<br />
Actually, this was an Australian publication.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jerry</title>
		<link>http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/archives/1101/comment-page-1#comment-9200</link>
		<dc:creator>Jerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alesrarus.funkydung.com/wordpress/archives/1101#comment-9200</guid>
		<description>This is secular-leaning thinking, and no more, and reminds me of how the American media consistently miss the mark in appraising the Church.

Note the subtle anti-Slavic bias, with the "Polish Onslaught", and forgetting that the Pope routinely convokes social and natural scientists, theologians, and other experts on the world's problems. Hardly the mark of an autocrat.  

Mr. implies that only Anglos would accept an election. Well, as I recall, a certain Florida ballot caused a lot of left-leaning Anglos  to declare an election null and void.  Most traditionalists would grind their teeth at a liberal Pope, but they are sufficiently grounded to stay loyal nonetheless. to the Chair of Peter. I trust their ecclesiology far more than that of Mr. Calli and his ilk.

Most serious Vatican observers are hung up between whether another Italian would be elected or someone from either Latin America or Africa. If Ron Calli is observing anything, I'd say that it's a mirror.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[This is secular-leaning thinking, and no more, and reminds me of how the American media consistently miss the mark in appraising the Church.<br />
<br />
Note the subtle anti-Slavic bias, with the &#034;Polish Onslaught&#034;, and forgetting that the Pope routinely convokes social and natural scientists, theologians, and other experts on the world&#039;s problems. Hardly the mark of an autocrat.  <br />
<br />
Mr. implies that only Anglos would accept an election. Well, as I recall, a certain Florida ballot caused a lot of left-leaning Anglos  to declare an election null and void.  Most traditionalists would grind their teeth at a liberal Pope, but they are sufficiently grounded to stay loyal nonetheless. to the Chair of Peter. I trust their ecclesiology far more than that of Mr. Calli and his ilk.<br />
<br />
Most serious Vatican observers are hung up between whether another Italian would be elected or someone from either Latin America or Africa. If Ron Calli is observing anything, I&#039;d say that it&#039;s a mirror.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
